- Introduction to mechanical painting in history. (PowerPoint)
- Using a photocopier or scanner arrange two or three man made objects and make two to three prints. (Photocopier or scanner)
- If using a photocopier, make one collage artwork by cutting up your photocopies and reorganising them on a new sheet of paper. If using a scanner you can make a physical collage or a digital collage by cutting and pasting, reorganising your images to create a new image. You will need a hard copy to work with. (Computer)
- Using your collage as a preparatory sketch, make a painting. (no ICT)
- con't painting. (no ICT)
- con't painting. (no ICT)
- finish painting.
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Mechanical painting
Self Portrait unit
- Introduce myself, class expectations, homework drawings (use PowerPoint).
- Teach tonal drawing and discuss self portrait photo design. (no ICT just old fashioned books)
- Photo shoot. (digital cameras, mobile phones with camera feature)
- Photo shoot part 2 and digital manipulation on photoshop. (digital cameras, mobile phones with camera feature, and computers)
- Demo on how to draw a face with tone. (no ICT here)
- Begin drawing self portrait, photograph progress. (digital camera)
- Begin drawing self portrait, photograph progress. (digital camera)
- Con't, photograph progress (digital camera)
- Con't, photograph progress (digital camera)
- Con't, photograph progress (digital camera)
- Finish self portrait, photograph final work. (digital camera)
- Download photographs into imovie:make a movie of your drawing process from beginning to end. (computer)
- Finish and show movie. (computer and smartboard/projector)
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Pigeons of the 21st century
Saturday, April 10, 2010
Community, people,place and learning
'Community is an elusive concept to define because of its subjective use in everyday life.
Nevertheless, it is commonly understood as group interaction among individuals who
experience a sense of identity through belonging (Ife and Tesoriero 2006: 97).
Community also incorporates obligations that imply active participation (Ife and
Tesoriero 2006: 97).'
'Lack of trust and confidence in personal experience has been linked to the growth of
institutions and reliance on specialist expertise. Ivan Illich for example, linked the trend
to undermining individual self-confidence in solving problems with the rise of
institutions such as schools and medical processes (Illich, 1976, & Smith 2006:21). In a
similar vein, Ife and Tesoriero have recently noted that reliance on the expertise of
strangers works against individual decision-making and erodes personal power and
agency (2006: 18).'
Foregrounding the importance of context and place to informal learning opens up the
possibility to talk about the pedagogies of place and place based learning. Gruenewald
asserts that place is profoundly pedagogical (Gruenewald 2006: 4). David Gruenewald
explains that:
“place-based education” or “community-based education” can be viewed as
umbrella terms for many traditions concerned with learners experiencing,
learning from, and contributing to local, community, and regional contexts.
Developing a coherent way of naming the traditions we are committed to is an
act of intellectual and strategic resistance; to me, it is nothing less than a
struggle for life in a schooling environment that is squeezing the life out of
learning. Articulating and demonstrating the merits – in a coordinated effort –
and policy makers that there are other ways of accountability. These other
ways of teaching and learning can help to engage and motivate learners in ways
that a standardized curriculum fails to do ( see eg. Melaville, et al, 2006).
Title: People, place and purpose : informal learning in community.
Personal Author: de Carteret P
Author Affiliation: Monash University
Added Corporate Author: Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE). Conference (2007 : Fremantle)
Source: In 'AARE 2007 International education research conference : Fremantle : papers collection' : [Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, 26-29 November 2007] compiled by P L Jeffrey. Melbourne : Australian Association for Research in Education, 2008
Source Title: AARE 2007 International education research conference : Fremantle : papers collection
reference list
Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). "Foundations of Place: A multidisciplinary framework for
place-conscious education." American Educational Researcher 40(3): 619-637.
Gruenewald, D. A. (2006). Why Place Matters: the everyday context everywhere of
experience, culture and education. AERA, US.
Ife, J. and F. Tesoriero (2006). Community Development: community-based alternatives
in an age of globalisation. Frenchs Forest, Pearson Education Australia.
Illich, Ivan. (1977). Medical Nemesis: the expropriation of health, New Yoirk, Random
Press.
Smith, M. E. (2006). Beyond the Curriculum. Learning in Places: the informal education
reader. Z. Bekerman, N. C. Burbules and D. Silberman-Keller. New York, Peter
Lang Publishing.
Internet safety-UK guidelines
Schools and social networking:
Fear or education
Cecilie Murray international guidelines for safer use of
social networking services, such as Facebook,
MySpace and Bebo have been launched in the
UK Parliament.
Internet safety
New international guidelines for safer use of
social networking services, such as Facebook,
MySpace and Bebo have been launched in the
UK Parliament.
Tips for other schools include:
• Watch videos on cybersafety, consult online sites
and hold classroom discussions to establish
safe and responsible online behaviours;
• Constantly reinforce the need for safety during
class, for example, use no surnames, no
addresses or phone numbers or other personal
details when online;
• Each student creates their own avatar using
MS Paint or another avatar when creating
websites. This is their personal ‘photographic
ID’ for blogging purposes, voicethreads and
other online sites. (See image below);
• Parents sign permission forms agreeing to the
publishing online of student work and online
photographs, on the condition that no names
are attached. Group photos are used where
possible;
• A checklist enables teachers to ensure these
conditions are adhered to;
• A partnership with parents is essential. At
information evenings with primary years
parents, outline the pedagogy for the use of
blogs and other Web 2.0 tools and highlight
cybersafety issues;
• A ‘techno corner’ article appears weekly in
the school and community newsletter;
• Parents are encouraged to ‘adopt’ a student
who may not have the internet at home;
• Staff and Principal add comments to student
blogs, so students are aware that they are
constantly being monitored;
• Teachers have joint administration rights with
students on their blogs, so comments, posts
and incoming links are moderated;
• An RSS reader on teacher Google readers
alerts teachers to new posts from students.
Title: Schools and social networking : fear or education.
Personal Author: Murray C
Author Affiliation: Delphian eLearning
Source: Synergy; v.6 n.1 p.8-12; 2008
Journal Title: Synergy
lecturers invited to facebook
This article discusses one particular problem, I use problem in the lightest possible sense: What do academics think of becoming 'friends' on a Facebook page when one has been invited from a student?
Some said absolutely not, and others said that it was useful to keep contact with alumni.
It would be interesting if the question was reposed, now, two years on. Would the answers be different? Would the responses still be split evenly between positive and negative?
Title: Face off online : pedagogy and engagement in social network sites.
Personal Author: Beckenham A
Author Affiliation: University of Canberra
Added Corporate Author: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA). Conference (31st : 2008 : Rotorua, New Zealand)
Source: In 'HERDSA 2008 : Engaging Communities' edited by M Barrow and K Sutherland, pages 66-70. Milperra NSW : HERDSA, 2008
Source Title: HERDSA 2008 : Engaging Communities
Document Type: Conference papers
What is social networking?
What is social networking?
Most social networking sites are web-based
andprovide a collection ofways to communicate.
Examples include:
• blogs (personal web-based journals)
• messaging (instant web-based messaging)
• chat (real time text-based interaction)
• discussion groups (delayed text-based
interaction)
• wikis (modifiable collaborative web pages)
• podcasting (subscription-based broadcast
over the web)
• vodcasting (video podcasts broadcast over
the web)
These technologies are supported by RSS
(really simple syndication)that enables the sharing
of news across the web. Subscription involves
signing up with your email address and a pass-
word, and it’s free. Popular sites with young
people include MySpace, Facebook, YouTube
and Bebo. Popular sites for teachers include
TeacherTube, Classroom 2.0 and Ning which
provide an online space for teachers to
collaborate and share teaching practice, ideas
and resources. p.8.
Title: Schools and social networking : fear or education.
Personal Author: Murray C
Author Affiliation: Delphian eLearning
Source: Synergy; v.6 n.1 p.8-12; 2008
Journal Title: Synergy
Online Collaboration and Online Communities
This project, conducted in late 2007 and early
2008 on behalf of the Victorian Department of
Education and Early Childhood Development’s
(DEECD) Ed Channel, focussed on the effectiveness
of collaborative online communities in fostering
and supporting student engagement, and the
effect of such communities on learning outcomes.
Specifically, it aimed to identify the impact such
social softwares have on the relationships that
students form within an online group or com-
munity, the role of that learning community in
the engagement of students as learners, and
the role of the teacher in utilising these social
softwares. p.26
‘It’s funner’: Teacher-directed
collaborative online communities
Pam Macintyre and Ric Canale
Huffaker (2005) suggests that blogs are both
individualistic and collaborative: the blogger can:
develop highly personalised content. Yet
bloggers connect with an online community . . .
creating an interwoven, dynamic organisation . . .
(2005, p. 94).
Fundamental to the educational opportunities
provided by blogs, is the students’ active role in
producing content, not merely being recipients of
it, and the diverse perspectives they encounter
and contribute (Ferdig & Trammell, 2004, p. 13).
Teachers and students were interviewed to
explore student engagement, factors assisting
community building and participants’ perceptions
of intended and actual educational outcomes.
Teachers were asked, for example: What were your
reasons for using this mode of communication
with your class? How important is ease of use?
Are your learning and teaching/pedagogical
objectives different in this mode than in traditional
delivery? Do you think teaching and learning is
deeper/more meaningful/analytical/critical/
engaging in this mode? Is the teacher-student,
student-student relationship different in this
environment?
Students were asked: Do you prefer on-line
interactions or face-to-face teaching and discus-
sion? Is the relationship with your teacher different
online compared to face-to-face mode? How
important is ease of use? Do you think you learn
better/express yourself more easily in this mode?
How important is the knowledge that you are
communicating with a ‘real’ audience? Student
and teacher-generated blog sites and wikis were
also examined. p.27
The study found that students liked online communication with teacher through wiki's and blogs because it is;
• Less formal;
• Easier to initiate, in the sense that the student
didn’t have to compete with others for the
teacher’s attention. “Yes, you get more of her
time than if you’re sitting with her because
there’s always other kids around talking to her
as well. But on the internet it’s easier to talk
to her”.
• Private, in the sense that other students
aren’t listening to their questions so they
don’t feel self-conscious about displaying
misunderstandings (this point was made
specifically in relation to email communications
and is not relevant to public blogs). “Because
noone’s listening, and you get more time with
them. Also because in class you can’t always
be talking to your friends, but with wikis you
can talk about your work as well, and no one
can interrupt. You can say what you want to
say. You’re more confident; you’ve got time to
say what you want to say”.
• Clearer and more accurate, because there is
time for reviewing and editing, and
• Convenient, because students regularly spend
time online anyway. p.29
Title: 'It's funnier' : teacher-directed collaborative online communities.
Personal Author: Macintyre, Pam; Canale, Ric
Author Affiliation: University of Melbourne. Graduate School of Education ; La Trobe University
Source: Synergy; v.7 n.1 p.26-30; 2009
Journal Title: Synergy
Facebook and stereotyoes
Walther and colleagues (2008) investigated how college students tended to make
judgements about a Facebook profile based on information that ‘friends’ posted on
their sites about that person. What this study found was:
(i) It is good to have good looking friends in Facebook as you gain no
advantage from looking better than your friends;
(ii) Complimentary or prosocial statements by friends about profile owners
improved the profile owner’s social attractiveness and credibility;
(iii) Facebook has the potential to reinforce stereotypes and behaviours that
could be harmful to young people (for example, if a target person is female
and pictures of her drunk are posted on other people’s facebooks then she
was denigrated whereas an attractive male in similar shots received
admiration and respect).
While Walther et al’s study confirms the double standards that persist in society, an
outcome of their research that is interesting in terms of self-representation and self-
exposure is that ‘friends’ statements significantly altered perceptions of profile owners’
(p. 44). One can alter his/her own details on their own profile or delete unwanted
photographs; however, it is difficult to modify or manipulate statements made by others
(for example, their pictures and wall postings). Walther’s research raises a significant
question that warrants further research into textual authority of social networks,
particularly, they ask: ‘Are we known by the company we keep?’ (p. 29).
Retrieved from: Digital Culture & Education (DCE)
Publication details, including instructions for authors
http://www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/
Look at me! Look at me! Self-
representation and self-exposure through
online networks
Kerry Mallan
School of Cultural and Language Studies in Education
Queensland University of Technology
Online Publication Date: 15 May 2009
Constructing New Social Patterns
'... what is
often attributed to being a fear of technology per se is more correctly a fear or anxiety
associated with new technological modes of being in the world.p.51.
Mallan writes about children's on-line identities on social networking sites like MySpace and some aspects of social relationships in this virtual environment.
In this section of the article'(Friends and Community: a sense of being-with and being there' p.58) it is described that the children in the study used MySpace and others to seek out like minded friends, but also as a way to establish popularity through 'Top Friends List' and though quantification. It was noted that girls would know the exact number of friends they had and boys were more likely to give an estimate.
One student talked about how she could contact others that came from the Solomon Islands. this reinforces other articles I have read about being able to communicate with others regardless of geographical location.
'The extension or merging of real life with online life does not necessarily mean
that all online communities simply replicate or replace all the dynamics and social
functions of traditional communities. Rather, as the students’ comments reported here
suggest, the technology itself is a key player in shaping how a community can operate in
complementing offline identity formation and social activities.' p.64
Digital Culture & Education (DCE)
Publication details, including instructions for authors
http://www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/
Look at me! Look at me! Self-
representation and self-exposure through
online networks
Kerry Mallan
School of Cultural and Language Studies in Education
Queensland University of Technology
Online Publication Date: 15 May 2009