Teachers looked for wikis that were:
- free
- were able to be accessed by invited members only
- that included a discussion page
- offering user authentication
In theory it was assumed that a wiki would encourage collaboration through a group writing process. That a wiki was a good way to teach knew knowledge building. That it could be a site of participation that was also a record of a community act. And that it was a authentic activity based on the constructivist view that learning is a social activity.
In the case study it was found that;
- very few students edited others pages, and when one student did it was met with hostility.
- that this refusal to impact on others writing was not seen in visual entries.
- Commenting on visual entries was seen as acceptable and legitimate.
- With visual entries students asked other students for help or advice.
- The studnets saw design as a periphery of school practice with one student stating "Writing's what gets you your grades, not pictures."
- this group focused on the task not on interactive engagement.
Grant, Lindsay (may 2006) Using wikis in schools: a case study.
FutureLab http://rhazen.edublogs.org/files/2008/01/wikis_in_schools_futurelab.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment