Sunday, April 25, 2010

Mechanical painting

Year 7 Mechanical painting unit
Seven lessons: Discover the history behind mechanical painting and go on a tour of the process of making one of your own.
  1. Introduction to mechanical painting in history. (PowerPoint)
  2. Using a photocopier or scanner arrange two or three man made objects and make two to three prints. (Photocopier or scanner)
  3. If using a photocopier, make one collage artwork by cutting up your photocopies and reorganising them on a new sheet of paper. If using a scanner you can make a physical collage or a digital collage by cutting and pasting, reorganising your images to create a new image. You will need a hard copy to work with. (Computer)
  4. Using your collage as a preparatory sketch, make a painting. (no ICT)
  5. con't painting. (no ICT)
  6. con't painting. (no ICT)
  7. finish painting.

Self Portrait unit

Year 8 tonal self portrait unit
I will be delivering 13 lessons to this year 8 group within the unit title: Me, Myself and I. Below is the lesson sequence and what technologies will be used.
  1. Introduce myself, class expectations, homework drawings (use PowerPoint).
  2. Teach tonal drawing and discuss self portrait photo design. (no ICT just old fashioned books)
  3. Photo shoot. (digital cameras, mobile phones with camera feature)
  4. Photo shoot part 2 and digital manipulation on photoshop. (digital cameras, mobile phones with camera feature, and computers)
  5. Demo on how to draw a face with tone. (no ICT here)
  6. Begin drawing self portrait, photograph progress. (digital camera)
  7. Begin drawing self portrait, photograph progress. (digital camera)
  8. Con't, photograph progress (digital camera)
  9. Con't, photograph progress (digital camera)
  10. Con't, photograph progress (digital camera)
  11. Finish self portrait, photograph final work. (digital camera)
  12. Download photographs into imovie:make a movie of your drawing process from beginning to end. (computer)
  13. Finish and show movie. (computer and smartboard/projector)

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Pigeons of the 21st century

The pigeon academics of St Marcs Square, unaware of e-ailments, e- business, e-communities, e-pedagogy, e-portfolios, rather they discuss, analyse, critique, compare and contrast, concrete communities and transitory communities. Dr Piper Pigeon (2009) an academic from the University of Aggregate asserts, "those who congregate in these concrete based worlds are the pigeon communities of the future. They are avant guard. They are true 21st century pigeons." Pigeon (2009) writes, "they are looking to the future, they embrace new mediums, they do not idealise the past as those who still live in the air and trees like primitives do. They do not make rock peckings or trace their families feet with droppings on cave walls. They contribute to creating future contemporary communities. They gather concrete, organise concrete, rearrange concrete, and create new and exciting things, all with concrete. They are the generation of the future." The evidence presented by the Dr. suggest this concrete life of these advanced life-forms that is the contemporary pigeon, is one we should all aspire to. Go now, get yourself some concrete, liquid or solid form it doesn't matter. Furthermore, make something with it, make something of yourself.
Retrieved from: www.pigeonsandconcrete.org@stmarcs.aggregate.com

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Community, people,place and learning

'Community is an elusive concept to define because of its subjective use in everyday life.

Nevertheless, it is commonly understood as group interaction among individuals who

experience a sense of identity through belonging (Ife and Tesoriero 2006: 97).

Community also incorporates obligations that imply active participation (Ife and

Tesoriero 2006: 97).'

'Lack of trust and confidence in personal experience has been linked to the growth of

institutions and reliance on specialist expertise. Ivan Illich for example, linked the trend

to undermining individual self-confidence in solving problems with the rise of

institutions such as schools and medical processes (Illich, 1976, & Smith 2006:21). In a

similar vein, Ife and Tesoriero have recently noted that reliance on the expertise of

strangers works against individual decision-making and erodes personal power and

agency (2006: 18).'

Foregrounding the importance of context and place to informal learning opens up the

possibility to talk about the pedagogies of place and place based learning. Gruenewald

asserts that place is profoundly pedagogical (Gruenewald 2006: 4). David Gruenewald

explains that:

“place-based education” or “community-based education” can be viewed as

umbrella terms for many traditions concerned with learners experiencing,

learning from, and contributing to local, community, and regional contexts.

Developing a coherent way of naming the traditions we are committed to is an

act of intellectual and strategic resistance; to me, it is nothing less than a

struggle for life in a schooling environment that is squeezing the life out of

learning. Articulating and demonstrating the merits – in a coordinated effort –

and policy makers that there are other ways of accountability. These other

ways of teaching and learning can help to engage and motivate learners in ways

that a standardized curriculum fails to do ( see eg. Melaville, et al, 2006).

Title: People, place and purpose : informal learning in community.

Personal Author: de Carteret P

Author Affiliation: Monash University

Added Corporate Author: Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE). Conference (2007 : Fremantle)

Source: In 'AARE 2007 International education research conference : Fremantle : papers collection' : [Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, 26-29 November 2007] compiled by P L Jeffrey. Melbourne : Australian Association for Research in Education, 2008

Source Title: AARE 2007 International education research conference : Fremantle : papers collection

reference list

Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). "Foundations of Place: A multidisciplinary framework for

place-conscious education." American Educational Researcher 40(3): 619-637.

Gruenewald, D. A. (2006). Why Place Matters: the everyday context everywhere of

experience, culture and education. AERA, US.

Ife, J. and F. Tesoriero (2006). Community Development: community-based alternatives

in an age of globalisation. Frenchs Forest, Pearson Education Australia.

Illich, Ivan. (1977). Medical Nemesis: the expropriation of health, New Yoirk, Random

Press.

Smith, M. E. (2006). Beyond the Curriculum. Learning in Places: the informal education

reader. Z. Bekerman, N. C. Burbules and D. Silberman-Keller. New York, Peter

Lang Publishing.

Internet safety-UK guidelines

Schools and social networking:

Fear or education

Cecilie Murray international guidelines for safer use of

social networking services, such as Facebook,

MySpace and Bebo have been launched in the

UK Parliament.

Internet safety

New international guidelines for safer use of

social networking services, such as Facebook,

MySpace and Bebo have been launched in the

UK Parliament.

Tips for other schools include:

• Watch videos on cybersafety, consult online sites

and hold classroom discussions to establish

safe and responsible online behaviours;

• Constantly reinforce the need for safety during

class, for example, use no surnames, no

addresses or phone numbers or other personal

details when online;

• Each student creates their own avatar using

MS Paint or another avatar when creating

websites. This is their personal ‘photographic

ID’ for blogging purposes, voicethreads and

other online sites. (See image below);

• Parents sign permission forms agreeing to the

publishing online of student work and online

photographs, on the condition that no names

are attached. Group photos are used where

possible;

• A checklist enables teachers to ensure these

conditions are adhered to;

• A partnership with parents is essential. At

information evenings with primary years

parents, outline the pedagogy for the use of

blogs and other Web 2.0 tools and highlight

cybersafety issues;

• A ‘techno corner’ article appears weekly in

the school and community newsletter;

• Parents are encouraged to ‘adopt’ a student

who may not have the internet at home;

• Staff and Principal add comments to student

blogs, so students are aware that they are

constantly being monitored;

• Teachers have joint administration rights with

students on their blogs, so comments, posts

and incoming links are moderated;

• An RSS reader on teacher Google readers

alerts teachers to new posts from students.

Title: Schools and social networking : fear or education.

Personal Author: Murray C

Author Affiliation: Delphian eLearning

Source: Synergy; v.6 n.1 p.8-12; 2008

Journal Title: Synergy

lecturers invited to facebook

This article discusses one particular problem, I use problem in the lightest possible sense: What do academics think of becoming 'friends' on a Facebook page when one has been invited from a student?

Some said absolutely not, and others said that it was useful to keep contact with alumni.

It would be interesting if the question was reposed, now, two years on. Would the answers be different? Would the responses still be split evenly between positive and negative?

Title: Face off online : pedagogy and engagement in social network sites.

Personal Author: Beckenham A

Author Affiliation: University of Canberra

Added Corporate Author: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA). Conference (31st : 2008 : Rotorua, New Zealand)

Source: In 'HERDSA 2008 : Engaging Communities' edited by M Barrow and K Sutherland, pages 66-70. Milperra NSW : HERDSA, 2008

Source Title: HERDSA 2008 : Engaging Communities

Document Type: Conference papers

What is social networking?

What is social networking?

Most social networking sites are web-based

andprovide a collection ofways to communicate.

Examples include:

• blogs (personal web-based journals)

• messaging (instant web-based messaging)

• chat (real time text-based interaction)

• discussion groups (delayed text-based

interaction)

• wikis (modifiable collaborative web pages)

• podcasting (subscription-based broadcast

over the web)

• vodcasting (video podcasts broadcast over

the web)

These technologies are supported by RSS

(really simple syndication)that enables the sharing

of news across the web. Subscription involves

signing up with your email address and a pass-

word, and it’s free. Popular sites with young

people include MySpace, Facebook, YouTube

and Bebo. Popular sites for teachers include

TeacherTube, Classroom 2.0 and Ning which

provide an online space for teachers to

collaborate and share teaching practice, ideas

and resources. p.8.

Title: Schools and social networking : fear or education.

Personal Author: Murray C

Author Affiliation: Delphian eLearning

Source: Synergy; v.6 n.1 p.8-12; 2008

Journal Title: Synergy

Online Collaboration and Online Communities

This project, conducted in late 2007 and early

2008 on behalf of the Victorian Department of

Education and Early Childhood Development’s

(DEECD) Ed Channel, focussed on the effectiveness

of collaborative online communities in fostering

and supporting student engagement, and the

effect of such communities on learning outcomes.

Specifically, it aimed to identify the impact such

social softwares have on the relationships that

students form within an online group or com-

munity, the role of that learning community in

the engagement of students as learners, and

the role of the teacher in utilising these social

softwares. p.26

‘It’s funner’: Teacher-directed

collaborative online communities

Pam Macintyre and Ric Canale

Huffaker (2005) suggests that blogs are both

individualistic and collaborative: the blogger can:

develop highly personalised content. Yet

bloggers connect with an online community . . .

creating an interwoven, dynamic organisation . . .

(2005, p. 94).

Fundamental to the educational opportunities

provided by blogs, is the students’ active role in

producing content, not merely being recipients of

it, and the diverse perspectives they encounter

and contribute (Ferdig & Trammell, 2004, p. 13).

Teachers and students were interviewed to

explore student engagement, factors assisting

community building and participants’ perceptions

of intended and actual educational outcomes.

Teachers were asked, for example: What were your

reasons for using this mode of communication

with your class? How important is ease of use?

Are your learning and teaching/pedagogical

objectives different in this mode than in traditional

delivery? Do you think teaching and learning is

deeper/more meaningful/analytical/critical/

engaging in this mode? Is the teacher-student,

student-student relationship different in this

environment?

Students were asked: Do you prefer on-line

interactions or face-to-face teaching and discus-

sion? Is the relationship with your teacher different

online compared to face-to-face mode? How

important is ease of use? Do you think you learn

better/express yourself more easily in this mode?

How important is the knowledge that you are

communicating with a ‘real’ audience? Student

and teacher-generated blog sites and wikis were

also examined. p.27

The study found that students liked online communication with teacher through wiki's and blogs because it is;

• Less formal;

• Easier to initiate, in the sense that the student

didn’t have to compete with others for the

teacher’s attention. “Yes, you get more of her

time than if you’re sitting with her because

there’s always other kids around talking to her

as well. But on the internet it’s easier to talk

to her”.

• Private, in the sense that other students

aren’t listening to their questions so they

don’t feel self-conscious about displaying

misunderstandings (this point was made

specifically in relation to email communications

and is not relevant to public blogs). “Because

noone’s listening, and you get more time with

them. Also because in class you can’t always

be talking to your friends, but with wikis you

can talk about your work as well, and no one

can interrupt. You can say what you want to

say. You’re more confident; you’ve got time to

say what you want to say”.

• Clearer and more accurate, because there is

time for reviewing and editing, and

• Convenient, because students regularly spend

time online anyway. p.29

Title: 'It's funnier' : teacher-directed collaborative online communities.

Personal Author: Macintyre, Pam; Canale, Ric

Author Affiliation: University of Melbourne. Graduate School of Education ; La Trobe University

Source: Synergy; v.7 n.1 p.26-30; 2009

Journal Title: Synergy

Facebook and stereotyoes

Walther and colleagues (2008) investigated how college students tended to make

judgements about a Facebook profile based on information that ‘friends’ posted on

their sites about that person. What this study found was:

(i) It is good to have good looking friends in Facebook as you gain no

advantage from looking better than your friends;

(ii) Complimentary or prosocial statements by friends about profile owners

improved the profile owner’s social attractiveness and credibility;

(iii) Facebook has the potential to reinforce stereotypes and behaviours that

could be harmful to young people (for example, if a target person is female

and pictures of her drunk are posted on other people’s facebooks then she

was denigrated whereas an attractive male in similar shots received

admiration and respect).

While Walther et al’s study confirms the double standards that persist in society, an

outcome of their research that is interesting in terms of self-representation and self-

exposure is that ‘friends’ statements significantly altered perceptions of profile owners’

(p. 44). One can alter his/her own details on their own profile or delete unwanted

photographs; however, it is difficult to modify or manipulate statements made by others

(for example, their pictures and wall postings). Walther’s research raises a significant

question that warrants further research into textual authority of social networks,

particularly, they ask: ‘Are we known by the company we keep?’ (p. 29).

Retrieved from: Digital Culture & Education (DCE)

Publication details, including instructions for authors

http://www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/

Look at me! Look at me! Self-

representation and self-exposure through

online networks

Kerry Mallan

School of Cultural and Language Studies in Education

Queensland University of Technology

Online Publication Date: 15 May 2009

Constructing New Social Patterns

'... what is

often attributed to being a fear of technology per se is more correctly a fear or anxiety

associated with new technological modes of being in the world.p.51.

Mallan writes about children's on-line identities on social networking sites like MySpace and some aspects of social relationships in this virtual environment.

In this section of the article'(Friends and Community: a sense of being-with and being there' p.58) it is described that the children in the study used MySpace and others to seek out like minded friends, but also as a way to establish popularity through 'Top Friends List' and though quantification. It was noted that girls would know the exact number of friends they had and boys were more likely to give an estimate.

One student talked about how she could contact others that came from the Solomon Islands. this reinforces other articles I have read about being able to communicate with others regardless of geographical location.

'The extension or merging of real life with online life does not necessarily mean

that all online communities simply replicate or replace all the dynamics and social

functions of traditional communities. Rather, as the students’ comments reported here

suggest, the technology itself is a key player in shaping how a community can operate in

complementing offline identity formation and social activities.' p.64

Digital Culture & Education (DCE)

Publication details, including instructions for authors

http://www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/

Look at me! Look at me! Self-

representation and self-exposure through

online networks

Kerry Mallan

School of Cultural and Language Studies in Education

Queensland University of Technology

Online Publication Date: 15 May 2009